Fiber, Copper, or Wireless: Which Connection Is Best for Your Company?

Which Social Media Site Do You Use Most for Business? [POLL]

This week, we want to know what social media site you're spending the most time on for your business. Check back for your most popular social media sites.

Social media has become a bigger part of a lot of small business’s marketing and customer engagement strategy since its infancy.

Quick question: Does anyone remember creating a MySpace page to promote their company? Sure, some — musicians, mostly — still use that platform but there are so many more popular options these days. And each one presents unique opportunities to reach an audience in a unique way.

Want to reach the general population? You’re probably using Facebook. Talking to your small business owner contemporaries? That sounds like a job for LinkedIn. Looking to be part of a national movement? A tweet with the right #hashtag gets you involved.

So, this week, we want to know …

Which social media site do you use most for business?

What Are Your Most Popular Social Media Sites?

We’re giving you a choice of the big ones: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Instagram, and Google+.

Let us know which platform is open most on your phone or occupying a tab most often in your web browser. In the comments section below, tell us why.

[“source-smallbiztrends”]

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 vs Moto G4 Plus vs Lenovo Zuk Z1: Which is the Best?

Xiaomi_Redmi_Note3_Zuk_z1_Moto_G4_Plus_camera_ndtv.jpg

HIGHLIGHTS
The Redmi Notice 3 excels in the performance and display branch.
The Zuk Z1 trumps the others with a higher digicam and battery existence.
You’ll in most cases emerge as with the Moto as the others may be long past in a flash.
Selecting a telephone in the under Rs. 15,000 fee section is like identifying what to devour in a foodcourtroom. There’s tons of options to pick out from, every providing better fee for cash than the opposite and on the identical time, you want to ensure you keep away from the ones that could looktop at the beginning but then make you suffer later.

Out of the sheer quantity of telephones which have been introduced within the past couple of monthson this section, three have clearly left a long-lasting impression on us. We’re of route talking about the Xiaomi Redmi Observe three (Overview), Moto G4 Plus (Evaluate) and the newly launched Lenovo Zuk Z1 (Assessment).

To be sincere, you cannot move wrong with any of them, however which one is the pleasant? We attemptto answer that very conundrum.

(Also see: Specs contrast – Xiaomi Redmi Be aware 3 vs Moto G4 Plus vs Lenovo Zuk Z1)

Design
Design is some thing it is very subjective and differs wildly but after using all 3 smartphones we’d have togo together with the Moto G4 Plus. It is the lightest and the slimmest the various 3 and plenty simpler to grip because of the rubber back. Motorola hasn’t compromised on the construct even though as it Alsohas a metal frame for pressure. the opposite two Additionally look precise and have metal builds butthey are not the maximum ergonomic when as compared to the Moto.

Winner – Moto G4 Plus

display
The excellent of the display is one of the vital elements as it‘s your simplest approach of interacting with your smartphone. All three telephones have 5.5-inch complete-HD presentations with scratch protection, which manage to provide sharp visuals. But, Xiaomi’s Daylight display hardware characteristic nudges itbeyond the opposite . The brightness ranges aren’t super at the Z1 although it does function a polarising coating to atone for that. The Moto G4 Plus is available in a close 2d despite having a everydayTFT display rather than IPS.

Winner – Xiaomi Redmi Observe three

Xiaomi_Redmi_Note3_Zuk_z1_Moto_G4_Plus_side_ndtv.Jpg
Software program
All 3 telephones excel within the Software branch with each Xiaomi and the Lenovo Zuk bringing specificversions of Android, so Selecting one relies upon on the form of consumer you’re. In case you want apure Nexus-like revel in, then the Moto G4 Plus is 7c5d89b5be9179482b8568d00a9357b2. With the mostcontemporary model of Android and just the bare crucial apps present, It is left up to the user to down load and customize what apps they need for unique obligations.

However, In case you‘re the kind of character who wants the customize each unmarried component at the phone, from the subject to the coloration of the notification LED, you then must be searching at Zuk Z1 which runs on Cyanogen OS (v12.1 on the time of this text). Xiaomi’s MIUI 7 Also gives lots of customisation, although in all likelihood not as full-size as Cyanogen. But, it does have one very usefulfunction which the others lack and that’s the capability to lock apps in your fingerprint, so handiestyou’ve got get right of entry to to them.

Winner – depends on your taste

overall performance
looking merely on the numbers, the Redmi Observe three is an easy winner. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 hexa-center SoC offers stellar performance over the growing older Snapdragon 801 inside the Z1 and the mid-variety Snapdragon 617 in the Moto G4 Plus. All three phones have 3GB RAM (despite the fact that you can get the 2GB versions of the Redmi Word three and G4 Plus for a chunk much less) andenormous onboard storage. Remember the fact that the Z1 compensates for the dearth of a microSD card slot with 64GB of storage. The Redmi Word 3 has a hybrid SIM slot however the legitimate expandablegarage aid is just 32GB. The Moto G However has a dedicated slot with an legit score of 128GB.

All 3 phones will easily cope with traumatic apps and video games, although we did word the Motoreceives warm as an alternative speedy while as compared to the alternative . Considering the overall performance of the interface, apps, fingerprint senor and connectivity functions, the Redmi Note 3 is theclean winner, accompanied carefully via the Zuk Z1.

Winner – Xiaomi Redmi Note 3

Battery lifestyles
All 3 telephones have full-size batteries so one can remaining you above a day of normal use. However, the Zuk Z1 outlasts the other with the aid of extra than an hour in our video loop check. Do maintain in thethoughts that despite the fact that the Z1 doesn’t aid fast charging, it does ship with a high abilitycharger for charging it fast. It’s simply that it may not charge as fast as the Redmi Word 3 or the Moto G4 Plus while beginning from 0.

Winner – Lenovo Zuk Z1

Xiaomi_Redmi_Note3_Zuk_z1_Moto_G4_Plus_camera_ndtv.Jpg
digital camera
The digital camera is some other integral thing in modern-day smartphone and all over again, It’s the Zuk Z1 that has the nice digital camera out of the three. Focusing speeds are brief and we managed to gettrue information in landscapes and macros. Plus, this is the first cellphone on this charge variety with optical image stabilisation (OIS). Low-light overall performance is commendable too, that is some thingthe Moto G4 Plus and Redmi Note three struggle with. The digital camera app is also the satisfactorysome of the 3 as it‘s easy to use for beginners and gives finer controls for extra expert users.

Winner – Lenovo Zuk Z1

Verdict
Like we referred to in advance, all 3 are superb smartphones in their own proper, so Selecting one willcompletely depend upon in which your priorities lie. Going through our individual scoring, It’s a tieamong the Zuk Z1 and the Redmi Notice 3. In case you‘re looking often at a great digicam and batterylifestyles, then the Lenovo Zuk Z1 is your satisfactory guess. It fares properly inside the otherdepartments as nicely however excels in these two unique ones. The Redmi Word 3 trumps the others in terms of show excellent and performance, no longer to mention the highest spec’d model continues to be inexpensive than the alternative .

However, do not discount the Moto G4 Plus just yet as despite the others having the top hand inmaximum departments, the Moto G4 Plus is the smartphone you will most likely turn out to be buying. Why? Simply because the Redmi Note three and Zuk Z1 will be almost impossible to get due to the ridiculous flash sale model. If lady luck is on your aspect then super, else There is usually Moto to fallback on.

down load the Devices 360 app for Android and iOS to stay updated with the modern-day tech news, product critiques, and one-of-a-kind offers on the popular mobiles.

Xiaomi Redmi Be aware three Xiaomi Redmi Word three
Rs. 9,999
Assessment
KEY Specs
information
Design
display
Software program
performance
Battery existence
camera
price for money
precise
terrific looks and build quality
Vibrant show
Robust CPU overall performance
excellent battery life
gives good value
Awful
Expandable storage restrained to 32GB
digital camera could have been higher
Examine unique Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Evaluation
Purchase AT
Amazon
Xiaomi Redmi Word 3 (Gold, 16GB)
Rs. 9,999
Amazon
Xiaomi Redmi Notice 3 (Silver, 32GB)
Rs. eleven,999
Amazon
Xiaomi Redmi Observe three (Gray, 16GB) Dark GreySold OUT
Rs. 9,999
Lenovo Zuk Z1 Lenovo Zuk Z1
Rs. 13,499
Assessment
KEY Specifications
news
Layout
display
Software program
overall performance
Battery existence
digicam
price for money
top
looks desirable, nicely built
correct display customisation features
awesome Software
First rate digital camera
properly battery lifestyles
Bad
Unlocking the phone is not as clean as it can be
Dated SoC
No expandable garage
best available thru flash income
Read targeted Lenovo Zuk Z1 Evaluate
Buy AT
Amazon
Lenovo Zuk Z1 (White, 64GB)
Rs. 13,499
Amazon
Lenovo Zuk Z1 (Space Grey, 64GB) – Sold OUT
Rs. 13,499
Motorola Moto G4 Plus Motorola Moto G4 Plus
Rs. thirteen,499
Assessment
KEY Specifications
information
Layout
display
Software
overall performance
Battery life
digital camera
price for cash
desirable
Glossy Layout and good construct
Brilliant display
Robust battery lifestyles
Nearinventory version of Android
Stepped forward digicam app
Horrific
No NFC
Low-light digital camera performance is common
Read detailed Motorola Moto G4 Plus Review
Buy AT
Amazon
Motorola Moto G4 Plus (White, sixteen GB)
Rs. thirteen,499
Amazon
Motorola Moto G4 Plus (Black, sixteen GB)
Rs. thirteen,499
Amazon
Motorola Moto G4 Plus (Black, 32 GB)
Rs. 14,999
Tags: Lenovo Zuk Z1, Lenovo Zuk Z1 price, Lenovo Zuk Z1 fee in India, Lenovo Zuk Z1 specifications, Moto G4, Moto G4 Plus, Moto G4 Plus fee, Moto G4 Plus price in India, Moto G4 Plus specifications, RedmiNotice three, smartphones, Xiaomi Redmi Notice 3, Xiaomi Redmi Word three price, Xiaomi Redmi Notice 3price in India, Xiaomi Redmi Word three specifications, Zuk Z1

OnePlus 3 Vs. Xiaomi Mi 5: Which One ought to You Get?

OnePlus 3 Vs. Xiaomi Mi 5: Which One Should You Get?

HIGHLIGHTS
The OnePlus three expenses Rs. 27,999, even as the Xiaomi Mi 5 costs Rs. 24,999.
each phones run the Snapdragon 820 SoC, but the OnePlus 3 has 6GB RAM.
Battery lifestyles and digicam performance are similarly correct on both.
rate has usually been an critical factor for human beings, and over time, become a miles larger aspectthan earlier than when selecting a phone, and today, you have got higher smartphones at low-pricedfees for customers. at the same time as most people of the movement remains inside the under-Rs. 15,000 segment, it isn’t hard to get topdegree first-class at a price this is a lot lower than the flagships of the last year or so.

while you think of flagship telephones, you can not help however believe having to pay round Rs. 50,000 for a smartphone, and telephones consisting of the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (evaluation) and LG G5 (review) help preserve that picture. however, recent launches which include the OnePlus three(review) and Xiaomi Mi 5 (assessment) are out to exchange the norms and make flagships less costly.

but if you‘re buying a phone proper now, which one need to you get – how do these examine with eachother? We break it right down to the fundamentals to answer the question of which smartphone may behigher for you.

oneplus3_vs_mi5_main2_ndtv.jpg
look and experience
when it comes to design, it is hard to go wrong sincerely, and certainly both of those phones lookgreat. whether you decide upon the OnePlus 3 or the Mi 5 is solely depending on your choice ofconstruct fabric. the previous functions an all-aluminium unibody, while the latter goes with a metal bodyand glass rear panel. The Mi 5 is lighter thanks to its smaller usual length, but the OnePlus 3 feels a lotgreater strong and durable.

There are minor build troubles inside the Mi five, as the rear panel has gaps at the edges and looks as though it’d be effortlessly removable, despite the fact that the phone does now not simply have adetachable lower back. because of this, and the sheer self assurance that we got from retaining the OnePlus 3, we’re inclined to supply victory to the latter.

Winner – OnePlus three

oneplus3_vs_mi5_back_ndtv.jpg
show
despite the fact that the telephones sport the equal complete-HD decision, there are a few keyvariations among the monitors of the 2. The OnePlus 3 has a slightly larger 5.five-inch display screen,as compared to the five.15-inch show on the Mi 5. This obviously makes the pixel density and sharpnessjust a bit better on the Mi 5, however this distinction is slightly major and as such both screens arenearly identical in sharpness.

the largest distinction lies inside the display screen technology utilized in each device. The Xiaomi Mifive uses an IPS liquid crystal display display, at the same time as the OnePlus 3 makes use of Amoledtechnology. which means the Mi five can cross plenty brighter than the OnePlus three, but does now notproduce blacks which might be as deep. moreover, the infinite comparison ratio at the OnePlus 3 methodthat colors are more accurate. both have their strengths and weaknesses, and we’re calling this contest a tie.

Winner – Tie

oneplus3_vs_mi5_top_ndtv.jpg
software
while each phones run on the Android Marshmallow framework, there are considerable variations of theirnumber one overlays. The OnePlus three makes use of OxygenOS, that’s a dual-layered interface with an app drawer and a homescreen, and is closely inspired through stock Android and CyanogenMod. Incontrast, the Xiaomi Mi 5 runs on MIUI 7, that is a single-layered interface and follows a different style andlayout.

each structures have lots taking place in the shape of customisation and tweaks supposed toinstallation your smartphone exactly the way you need it. The Mi 5‘s customisations and tweaks are geared toward security, even as the OnePlus three favours ease of use and lightness of the system, which improves performance. even as the MIUI-powered Mi 5 has first rate software in its personal right, wepick the OxygenOS-powered OnePlus three in this case.

Winner – OnePlus 3

oneplus3_vs_mi5_fingerprint_ndtv.jpg
Fingerprint sensor
each the Xiaomi Mi 5 and OnePlus 3 have fingerprint sensors on the the front of the device, integrated intothe home key. however, even as the Mi five has a physical domestic key that may be pressed down, the OnePlus 3 has a hintsensitive capacitive key. The Mi five does now not sign up fingerprints from standby mode; it desires to first be woken. The OnePlus 3 can sign up prints and unencumber the telephone even from standby mode. both sensors can be used for extra safety other than just unlocking the telephone.

but, the sensor at the OnePlus 3 is just a little faster and appears more accurate, primarily due to the facttime is not spent in first waking the smartphone via pressing down on the house button. it’s one of thenice fingerprint sensors we have ever utilized in a phone, and is the palms down winner in this contest.

Winner – OnePlus 3

oneplus3_vs_mi5_camera_ndtv.jpg
digital camera
each telephones use 16-megapixel sensors for the number one camera, and are capable of capturingvideo at up to 4K decision. The front cameras are unique although, with the OnePlus 3 providing aneight-megapixel shooter with 1.four-micron pixels and the Mi 5 the usage of a four-megapixel sensor with 2-micron pixels. each phones shoot properly in right mild and indoors, and feature moderate weaknesseswhile capturing in low-mild.

additionally, there are some flaws inside the digicam app and software of each, and each phonesadditionally offer optical photo stabilisation and taking pictures modes along with HDR, landscape andgradual movement video. Selfies are terrific on the two telephones as well, and as a end result, we can not country which the higher of the 2 is in terms of digicam.

Winner – Tie

performance
The OnePlus three and Xiaomi Mi 5 both feature Qualcomm’s modern-day flagship SoC, the Snapdragon 820. however, the OnePlus has the processor clocked at a far better 2.15GHz + 1.6GHz configurationthroughout its 4 cores, at the same time as the Mi 5 throttles this a bit to 1.8GHz + 1.3GHz. And at the same time as both phones use the new LPDDR4 model of RAM, the OnePlus three has twice as a whole lot as the Xiaomi Mi five with a significant 6GB at your disposal.

performance is just a chunk better on OnePlus 3, way to an green combination of the SoC, RAM andsoftware. despite the fact that the Mi five is not any slouch, the reliability and uncooked electricity of OnePlus just about enables it take this win.

Winner – OnePlus 3

Battery existence and charging
In a natural evaluation based totally on our video loop check, the Xiaomi Mi five ran for thirteen hours,five mins and the OnePlus three ran for 16 hours, forty five mins. In everyday use, both phones easilyultimate an afternoon or extra, depending on how you use it. even as the OnePlus three has a extraelectricitygreen Amoled display screen, the Mi five makes up through its underclocked-yetpowerfulSoC.

Battery lifestyles entirely depends on the manner you use the telephone, however more extremeobligations and constant 4G connectivity can have a greater impact on the OnePlus three than the Mi 5.more screen time will of direction reason the battery to drain quicker on the Mi 5, so this is an identicalcontest.

both telephones use some shape of brief charging era, with the Xiaomi Mi five the usage of Qualcommquick charge and the OnePlus 3 the usage of dash price. at the same time as Qualcomm’s is the triedand examined technology, sprint rate uses a special gadget of electricity control which makes the charger do all of the paintings, thereby preventing excessive warmness at the smartphone. once more,each technology are extra or much less same.

Winner – Tie

oneplus3_vs_mi5_bottom_ndtv.jpg
Verdict
After our evaluation, it’s clear that the OnePlus 3 is the winner right here. It has better layout, softwareand overall performance, in addition to a visibly quicker and more accurate fingerprint sensor. The Xiaomi Mi 5 can simplest draw stage in terms of camera, display screen first-rate and battery life, and not using a actual wins over the OnePlus three. moreover, even as neither cellphone allows for expandable garage, the OnePlus 3 has 64GB of internal garage, as compared to 32GB at the Mi five. And as such, the OnePlusthree is our firm recommendation among the two.

but, it turned into a close choice, and we recognise that many components of a telephone are subjective. The Xiaomi Mi 5 does have a few benefits over the OnePlus three. it’s smaller and lighter, has a brighter screen, may want to produce higher battery existence below positive situations, and fans of MIUI will clearly opt for the attention to security and its related customisation options. And importantly, it’scheaper than the OnePlus three by means of Rs. three,000. If those elements are vital to you, the Xiaomi Mi five could be a greater appealing choice.

each phones are available to shop for now on line, freed from any registration, flash sales or invite-primarily based sale models. rest confident whichever alternative you pick, you’ll be shopping for ansuper phone.

download the devices 360 app for Android and iOS to stay updated with the present day techinformation, product evaluations, and different deals at the famous mobiles.

Florida government Investigating Incident in which teenager woman Allegedly Had intercourse with multiple companions in excessive college lavatory

Authorities Investigating Alleged Teen Sex in High School Bathroom

per week after a fifteenyearantique Florida female allegedly had intercourse with more than onecompanions in a public excessive college bathroom, the state‘s branch of children and families is investigating the alleged incident with local government.

firstly, the Lee County Sherriff’s office had declined to pursue any crook fees resulting from the incident. The woman and her own family declined to press expenses, and it appears that the female‘s companionshad been also minors.

but the entirety changed numerous days later whilst, in line with sheriff’s office spokesman Tony Schall, a cellphone video of the incident turned into published on-line and sent to numerous informationoutlets. as a minimum one of the information stations contacted authorities.

The emergence of the video has brought about authorities to investigate whether any laws have beendamaged. Schall declined to complicated on any viable costs.

need to preserve up with the modern day crime coverage? click right here to get breaking crimeinformation, ongoing trial insurance and information of interesting unsolved instances inside the properCrime newsletter.

Florida crook defense legal professional Richard Hornsby tells humans that the cellular phone videopossibly pressured the hand of authorities, who now visual photos of what occurred in that bathroom.

“This video is unbiased evidence out of doors of the woman,” Hornsby says. “The video could deliver agraphic indication of what came about at some stage in the incident.”

additionally, everybody who dispensed the video may want to face expenses. “Florida has a sexting lawfor minors,” says Hornsby. “but if any adults retransmitted the video, they might be charged with violatingchild pornography legal guidelines.”

in line with a police document, the lady scholar had intercourse with more than one male college students after faculty hours on can also 17. Lee County college spokeswoman Amity Chandler said in aannouncement on Tuesday that while 25 boys have been visible going into the bathroom, the number of boys the woman had sex with “is less than the wide variety seen going into the restroom.”

In a letter to mother and father, college superintendent Greg Adkins entreated dad and mom not to rushto judgement. “they’re adolescents who have made a extreme mistake,” he wrote. “They ought to now be afforded the opportunity to examine from their mistakes.”

Babyfaced,teen,computer,geek,designed,programmes,which,helped,cyber-hackers,crash,224,000,websites,worldwide

Young computer geek Grant Manser admitted the charges

A babyfaced computer geek designed programmes which helped cyber-hackers crash 224,000 websites around the world .

Grant Manser created the damaging software from his bedroom and sold it on the ‘dark web’ to customers around the globe for as little as £4.99, a court heard.

The then 16-year-old’s “stresser” program worked by bombarding websites, servers and email addresses with so much information they crashed.

Among the victims were companies, schools, colleges and government departments,the Birmingham Mail reported .

Manser, now aged 20, from Pear Tree Close, Kidderminster, pleaded guilty to six charges under the Computer Misuse Act and four under the Serious Crime Act.

Read more : Anonymous ‘hacks website before 55 million people’s data is leaked by second group’

Judge Nicholas Cole sentenced Manser to two years youth detention suspended for 18 months with the requirement to perform 100 hours unpaid work and also pay £800 costs.

But he was spared jail after the judge accepted that he only did it for financial gain and was “young and naive”.

Birmingham Crown Court heard how Manser’s scheme operated over a four year period between January 2012 and November 2014.

BM
The case was heard at Birmingham Crown Court

Raj Punia, prosecuting, said the defendant was arrested at the family home in November 2014 by officers from the Regional Cyber Crime Unit and computer equipment seized.

It was found to contain four systems called Dejabooter, Vexstresser, netspoof and Refinedstresser, known in the computer world as DOS – “denial of service” software.

When deployed these DOS programs flooded a chosen website, server or email address with so much data they could not cope, causing them to temporarily crash.

Manser sold the software via the ‘dark web’ – the hidden internet only used for criminal purposes – at prices ranging from £4.99 to £20.

Miss Punia said Manser had 12,800 registered users and, of these, just under 4,000 had bought DOS packages. They had then carried out 603,499 attacks on 224,548 targets.

One UK victim was Harrogate and Hull College which saw its entire computer network crash for 14 hours after a disgruntled student brought one of Manser’s packages because he was unhappy at being kept behind for detention.

Read more : Hungry hacker tricks Domino’s into delivering him FREE PIZZA – and a dessert too

Miss Punia said Manser accepted payment by PayPal and had a turnover of £50,000 during the period he was operating.

She said although it was widely acknowledged that “stresser” programs could be used legitimately by companies to test their own vulnerability, in this case Manser’s software was “only designed for illegal criminal purposes”.

By the time he was arrested, Manser’s business was doing so well he had started to advertise for staff.


The programme helped cyber-hackers crash 224,000 websites around the world

During police interviews, the teenager said he had got the idea after working for someone in the United States and seeing how much money he made from the scheme.

Among the victims his customers targeted were companies, councils and government departments across the world, including Poland, France, other EU countries, the United States and the Netherlands.

Jamie Baxter, defending, said his client only designed and sold the systems to make money. “He is not a hacker, the system doesn’t take or hack any information from the websites being attacked,” he said.

And he said he had built safeguards into the program to ensure that organisations on a “blacklist” were not attacked. These included banks, any healthcare organisation, the police and the FBI.

“He was only 16 when he started to do this and it was his immaturity and naivety which led him to commit these offences,” Mr Baxter said.

His client had not spent the £50,000 extravagantly, but on updating his computer equipment and also on his hobby of his motorbike.

[“source-Gadgets”]