Right here’s Why We Won’t Be Getting a new Burnout Game Anytime Quickly

Here's Why We Won't Be Getting a New Burnout Game Anytime Soon

Burnout became a popular motion racing franchise from Criterion Video games.
Criterion became working on an excessive sports activities Recreation that has been cancelled.
It had sun shades of its earlier identify – Burnout Paradise.
At E3 2014 we were dealt with to a proof of concept from Criterion Video games – creators of the a hitBurnout racing collection. It merged open-global severe sports adventure with shades of 2008’ssurprising Burnout Paradise.

Speedy ahead to E3 2016 and there’s been no sign of Criterion Games barring a point out in one in every of EA’s motion pictures for its Big name Wars Games stating that the developer is assisting within theadvent of some of those titles.

Now its publisher and owner Electronic Arts has said that Criterion Gamesextreme sports activities taskhas been cancelled.

Even as they have got moved on from the previous project they have got spoken approximately and are not pursuing it, they’re continuing to build new thoughts and experiment with new IP for EA, in additionto persevering with to collaborate with other EA studios,” an EA consultant explained to GameSpot.

What this indicates is, similar to Command & Conquer, Medal of Honor, and Dead Space, it’s safe to saythat you shouldn’t assume a new Burnout Game or some thing remotely such as it inside the futureimmediate or otherwise.

Throw within the fact that EA’s attention appears to be sports activities, Megastar Wars, and Battlefield will ensure that except its Want for Pace, some other racing Game is out of the question.

it is possibly the most numerous variety of cars you have ever seen,” Criterion widespread supervisorMatt Webster said in 2014. “The point is bringing them together. And that in and of itself is going to causestories that human beings have no longer visible earlier than, and in reality, in all likelihood, emergentkinds of play that we may want to by no means design for, however they’re certainly all steady with one another.”

Download the Devices 360 app for Android and iOS to stay up to date with the present day tech news, product reviews, and specific deals at the popular mobiles.

Tags: Burnout, Burnout 2, Burnout 2 point of Impact, Burnout 2016, Burnout three, Burnout Crash, Burnout Dominator, Burnout Paradise, Burnout Revenge, Burnout Takedown, Criterion Video games, E3, E3 2014, E3 2016, EA, Gamespot, New Burnout, New Burnout Game

we are able to Win Majority Of 21 Seats If Bypolls Held In Delhi: Ajay Maken

We Will Win Majority Of 21 Seats If Bypolls Held In Delhi: Ajay Maken

Ajay Maken additionally accused the Aam Aadmi celebration of deceptive the humans at the chiefParliamentary Secretary (CPS) difficulty. (report photograph)
NEW DELHI: Delhi Congress chief Ajay Maken today asserted that his birthday party will win the general public of the 21 seats if by way of-elections are held after the disqualification of AAP legislators who’vebeen appointed as chief Parliamentary Secretaries.

maximum of those assembly seats belong to Congress stalwarts like Mahabal Mishra, Arvinder Singhadorable and AK Walia. we are assured that we can win majority of these 21 seats if through-elections are held,” stated Mr Maken, at the same time as addressing a press convention on the birthday celebrationheadquarters in New Delhi.

He brought that Congress may also become the most important party in these elections and the post ofleader of competition within the Delhi Legislative assembly might also fall into their kitty.

Mr Maken additionally accused the Aam Aadmi party (AAP) of misleading the people at the chiefParliamentary Secretary (CPS) problem.

a prime Parliamentary Secretary as a minimum gets an office space, a car and driver if no longer any remuneration. Then how this isn’t always an workplace of profit,” asked Mr Maken who changed into a CPS to Sheila Dikshit in her first tenure as leader minister of Delhi.

while Sheila Dikshit had added a bill for my appointment, it changed into brought in meeting as a cashinvoice. again in 2007, when an change become added in, it remained a cash invoice,” Mr Maken saidwhile he become requested to describe the legislative component of the bill.

He asserted that if AAP had added this invoice via a proper channel, the President could have given his assent to it.

The President’s refusal to signal this bill may also result in the disqualification of 21 AAP legislators.

“AAP had appointed these CPS on March thirteen, nearly 30 days after Arvind Kejriwal changed into sworn in as chief Minister. And in the course of the identical length Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan have been thrown out of the party,” Mr Maken said insisting that AAP disbursed those posts to hold thosehuman beings with them.

otherwise, they would have long gone with Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan,” he introduced.

Mr Maken had led a delegation of Congress leaders to the Election commission asking for disqualification of those 21 AAP legislators.

10 women We well known This year

10 Women We Admired This Year

In what has been a totally eventful year, several moments stood out as beacons of desire and notion forladies the world over. From ladies balloting for and winning seats in Saudi Arabia to German Chancellor Angela Merkel being named Time’s ‘man or woman of the yr 2015,’ lady achievers made the world proud and left a big mark in the fields of politics and governance, sports activities and showbiz.

right here are 10 girls who we well known in 2015:

1. Saudi ladies Councilors: A big step for Saudi girls, a giant jump for womankind. In a first, as many as 20 Saudi girls won seats inside the country‘s landmark municipal elections that have been thrown open tofemale electorate and candidates for the first time.

at the same time as they represent simplest one percent of the 2,100 seats up for grabs, this victory is being hailed as a big step towards women‘s empowerment. In a country wherein girls nevertheless livevery confined lives – they need to be chaperoned always, aren’t permitted to pressure and are ruled by means of guardianship laws which offer guys the proper to make final selections on their behalf – vote casting for and winning seats in the elections bureaucracy a massive milestone.

2. Patricia Arquette: It turned into the Oscar moment that made 3-time Oscar winner Meryl Streep sit up and shout “sure!” and Hollywood applaud in guide. This 12 months‘s best assisting Actress used her Oscarreputation speech to speak approximately gender and make contact with for identical pay. “To eachwoman who gave birth, to each taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we’ve fought for everyone‘s equalrights,” said Patricia Arquette. “it is our time to have salary equality as soon as and for all, and equal rights for girls in the united states of america of the us,” she introduced to loud applause. The Boyhood actress led a growing chorus of ladies in Hollywood urging that the pay gap be bridged. Actresses Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Lawrence, Nicole Kidman and other leading woman voices are refusing to be silenced.

3. Jasmin Golubovska: The girl better referred to as the bad-ass “lipstick protester” fired up publiccreativeness and social media with simply one photo. Amid protests in opposition to the Macedonian highMinister Nikola Gruevski and his cabinet, Jasmin Golubovska turned into photographed the use of arebellion police protect as a replicate to use purple lipstick moments before planting a kiss on it.

Ms Golubovska told the The mother or father she initially wanted to attract a coronary heart on theprotect, an concept the policeman in front of her did not like in any respect. She tried her luck andrequested him if she may want to instead use his defend as a mirror. “He didn’t flow but I did see him smile, very slightly,” Ms Golubovska told The parent about the policeman’s reaction to the kiss.

4. Sania Mirza and Martina Hingis: Tennis’ golden ladies Sania Mirza and Martina Hingis have had nothingshort of a dream run in 2015. With two Grand Slam wins together and turning into the arena primary in doubles ratings, the ladies have finished their international locations proud. aside from the 2 Grand Slams, the sportstars received eight other titles together this 12 months.

subsequent yr, if not higher it, optimistically, we can equal what we’ve got done. it is hard to have abetter yr than this. but, who is aware of, what we (with doubles accomplice Martina Hingis) can docollectively. it would be notable to win another Slam,” Sania informed a media organization.

five. Saina Nehwal: Shuttler Saina Nehwal created records this yr through occupying the world No. 1function in badminton rankings after winning the India Open semifinal (she went on to win the finals asproperly). the first Indian girl badminton participant to reap this feat, Saina continued to create recordswith the aid of turning into the first Indian to win a silver medal at the sector Badminton Championships this year.
despite the fact that she lost her range spot to Carolina Marin earlier this month, Saina has blazed a pathof glory for herself and her u . s ..

6. Deepika Padukone: From commencing up to the arena about her warfare with melancholy to incomesrave reviews for her scene-stealing performance opposite Amitabh Bachchan and Irrfan Khan in Piku, Deepika has had quite a 12 months. The actress made several headlines in the course of 2015 – startingthe ‘live, Love, sniggerfoundation that targets to useful resource people battling depression,providing inside the My desire video which earned her both reward and flak in same proportions, an on-off friendship with Kangana Ranaut, being the handiest female most of the top 10 of Forbes listing of India’stop one hundred celebrities, her latest photograph with xXx big name Vin Diesel, and extra.

Singled out for praise for her performance opposite Ranbir Kapoor in Tamasha and contrary Ranveer Singh in Bajirao Mastani, it is safe to say that 2015 changed into well and surely the year of Deepika Padukone.

7. Priyanka Chopra: Her yr began with an acclaimed flip as Ayesha Mehra in Dil Dhadakne Do but Priyanka’ssecond within the solar clearly came whilst she headlined the yank tv display Quantico. The actress haswon rave reviews for her position as FBI recruit Alex Parrish and has even earned a humans‘s preferenceAwards nomination.

it is not all. Priyanka ends the yr with a bang as Kashibai in Bajirao Mastani. What a yr it is been for her.

eight. Angela Merkel: The German Chancellor is Time mag‘s ‘man or woman of the 12 months 2015.’ Timedescribed Ms Merkel as the “de facto leader of the european Union” and lauded her leadership over the Greece debt disaster and for starting Germany’s doors to refugees and migrants.

“For asking extra of her country than maximum politicians would dare, for status firm in opposition totyranny in addition to expedience and for offering steadfast ethical management in a world where it’s farin quick supply, Angela Merkel is Time’s individual of the year,” wrote Nancy Gibbs, handling editor of TIME.

She additionally tops Forbes lists of a hundred maximum powerful girls of 2015.

9. Aung San Suu Kyi: Myanmar’s pro-democracy chief spent decades below residence arrest before beinglaunched in 2010. In November 2015, she led the national League for Democracy to a landslide victory in the united states of america‘s first brazenly-contested election due to the fact 1990. 70-12 monthsvintage Suu Kyi, who turned into one of the international‘s greatknown political prisoners for maximumof her 24-year political profession, is constitutionally prohibited from the united states of america‘s presidency. She has, but, vowed to control the u . s . from “above the president.”

10. Pirelli models: In a stunning signal of the time, the Pirelli calendar, famous for displaying titillatingpictures of semi-clad models, featured women achievers as an alternative in its calendar for 2016. Photographed with the aid of US photographer Annie Leibovitz, the calendar has been unanimously hailed fordeciding on to feature girls which includes tennis celebrity Serena Williams, American comedian Amy Schumer – each of whom posed semi-nude – 82yearold artist Yoko Ono, singer Patti Smith and chinese language actress Yao Chen.

stunning, gross, strong, thin, fats, quite, unpleasant, sexy, disgusting, wonderful, female. thank you@annieleibovitz,” Amy Schumer tweeted.

Sonam Kapoor: we are not looking to sell Neerja


“NEERJA BHANOT IS AN suggestion and she or he HAD grow to be quite well-known 30 YEARS ago. SO it is OUR ENDEAVOUR THAT SHE becomes AN inspiration once more. THIS film IS FOR NEERJA BHANOT. we’re not looking to promote THIS movie, we are simply trying to encourage people WITH THIS film,” SONAM stated right here
Actress Sonam Kapoor says the makers of her upcoming film Neerja are not looking tosell‘ the film to thetarget market, but most effective intend to encourage human beings with the tale of Neerja Bhanot, wholost her existence at the same time as saving others on a hijacked flight. (additionally examine: Sonam Kapoor is ‘Emotionally connected‘ to Neerja)

Sonam, who visited Neerja’s alma mater St Xavier’s university on Friday, unveiled a stone plaque offeringNeerja’s call and info of her achievements.

The actress said, “i am so satisfied that Xavier’s has given us this possibility and given her this amazinghonour of continually being on the walls in this institution.”

Neerja become provided the Ashok Chakra for saving several hundred lives as an air hostess on thehijacked Pan Am Flight seventy three in 1986, in the end dropping her life within the struggle with hijackers.

“Neerja Bhanot is an suggestion and he or she had grow to be pretty famous 30 years ago. So it’s milesour endeavour that she becomes an idea again. This film is for Neerja Bhanot. we’re not trying to sell thisfilm, we are just looking to encourage people with this movie,” Sonam said here.

The actress said the makers based totally their promotional method also on the concept of inspiring theyouth.

it truly is why we are going to faculties and speakme about courageous humans. it’s farunconventional, and we don’t know how it’s going to get translated. however we’re seeking to dosomething exceptional and new, so that it is about her in place of us simply promoting the film,” statedSonam.

The actress delivered, “The film is for young human beings, to encourage the future of India, to mentionthat we are able to all be heroes. I speak lots about myself, however now it’s important to talk aboutNeerja and the values she stood for. a variety of human beings are understanding that and considering the fact that. i’m hoping absolutely everyone recognises what we are looking to painting.”

What proposal did Sonam take from Neerja?

“That anyone have a hero in us. She changed into an regular woman, she did her obligation and sheunderstood what is the quality part of her, and she explored that and stored 359 lives. in case you do what you believe you studied is proper in order to do for other human beings, all of us can be a hero.”

Neerja additionally co-stars Shabana Azmi and Shekhar Ravjiani.

right here’s Why we will likely in no way Get The Witcher 4

Here's Why We Will Probably Never Get The Witcher 4

Blood and Wine is the last we’re going to see of The Witcher series.
CD Projekt crimson has showed it isn’t always working at the Witcher 4.
Cyberpunk 2077 and any other identify are inside the works on the corporation.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is probable one of the pleasant if not the fine game of this generation thus far.even as developer CD Projekt purple is setting the very last touches to its final enlargement, The Witcherthree: Wild Hunt – Blood and Wine, it has also showed that it has no plans for another new Witcher game.

“We virtually don’t know. We do not have anything deliberate as of now to be sincere on the nextWitcher,” said CD Projekt Co-Founder Marcin Iwinski in verbal exchange with Eurogamer.

“As we stated before, never say by no means but proper now it is genuinely Blood and Wine. that is thecease. Blood and Wine is the last and there might not be any Witcher any time quickly – if there ever may be one. and i would really like to look how humans sense approximately it, if they will enjoy it.”

The motive for The Witcher three being the last recreation inside the series is in its future plans. The Polish organization currently revealed its intentions to have its lengthy awaited rolegambling sport (RPG) Cyberpunk 2077 out after 2017 and every other unnamed large finances triple-A RPG out among 2017 and 2021. The latter led many to count on it would be The Witcher four but Iwinski claimed in any other case.

we’re a publicly traded company so we can’t comment on that however i will guarantee you we are notoperating on any other Witcher,” he said.

With CD Projekt crimson running on Cyberpunk 2077 and its thriller RPG, Iwinski also hinted that itsrunning on “a brand new sort of video game layout formerly unexplored by the studio” which could in all likelihood point to its intentions to work on digital truth what with the HTC Vive and Oculus Rift availableand the ps VR slated for later this year.

if you still need extra adventures of Geralt of Rivia, the Blood and Wine growth will be available from may additionally 31. In India you may anticipate to pay Rs. 369 for it on Steam (as that turned into what theprevious enlargement, Hearts of Stone changed into priced at) or $9.99 (approximately Rs. 666) on GOG.com for a DRM-unfastened model.

Assuming CD Projekt pink persist with the identical pricing of Hearts of Stone at the PS4 and Xbox One,anticipate to pay Rs. 832 and Rs. 760 respectively.

down load the gadgets 360 app for Android and iOS to live updated with the present day tech news, product opinions, and distinctive deals on the famous mobiles.

Tags: CD Projekt crimson, Cyberpunk 2077, GOG, Marcin Iwinski, PS4, Steam, The Witcher 3, The Witcher 3Wild Hunt, The Witcher 4, Witcher three, Witcher three Blood and Wine, Witcher three Blood and Wine rate, Witcher three Blood and Wine price India, Witcher three Blood and Wine launch Date, Witcher 3 DLC, Witcher 3 more suitable version, Witcher three enlargement %, Witcher three recreation of the yearedition, Witcher three Hearts of Stone, Witcher three Wild Hunt, Witcher 4, Xbox One

Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

NEW YORK—If you, me and every person and thing in the cosmos were actually characters in some giant computer game, we would not necessarily know it. The idea that the universe is a simulation sounds more like the plot of “The Matrix,” but it is also a legitimate scientific hypothesis. Researchers pondered the controversial notion Tuesday at the annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate here at the American Museum of Natural History.

Moderator Neil deGrasse Tyson, director of the museum’s Hayden Planetarium, put the odds at 50-50 that our entire existence is a program on someone else’s hard drive. “I think the likelihood may be very high,” he said. He noted the gap between human and chimpanzee intelligence, despite the fact that we share more than 98 percent of our DNA. Somewhere out there could be a being whose intelligence is that much greater than our own. “We would be drooling, blithering idiots in their presence,” he said. “If that’s the case, it is easy for me to imagine that everything in our lives is just a creation of some other entity for their entertainment.”


A popular argument for the simulation hypothesis came from University of Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrum in 2003, when he suggested that members of an advanced civilization with enormous computing power might decide to run simulations of their ancestors.  They would probably have the ability to run many, many such simulations, to the point where the vast majority of minds would actually be artificial ones within such simulations, rather than the original ancestral minds. So simple statistics suggest it is much more likely that we are among the simulated minds.

And there are other reasons to think we might be virtual. For instance, the more we learn about the universe, the more it appears to be based on mathematical laws. Perhaps that is not a given, but a function of the nature of the universe we are living in. “If I were a character in a computer game, I would also discover eventually that the rules seemed completely rigid and mathematical,” said Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). “That just reflects the computer code in which it was written.”

Furthermore, ideas from information theory keep showing up in physics. “In my research I found this very strange thing,” said James Gates, a theoretical physicist at the University of Maryland. “I was driven to error-correcting codes—they’re what make browsers work. So why were they in the equations I was studying about quarks and electrons and supersymmetry? This brought me to the stark realization that I could no longer say people like Max are crazy.”


Yet not everyone on the panel agreed with this reasoning. “If you’re finding IT solutions to your problems, maybe it’s just the fad of the moment,” Tyson pointed out. “Kind of like if you’re a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.”

And the statistical argument that most minds in the future will turn out to be artificial rather than biological is also not a given, said Lisa Randall, a theoretical physicist at Harvard University. “It’s just not based on well-defined probabilities. The argument says you’d have lots of things that want to simulate us. I actually have a problem with that. We mostly are interested in ourselves. I don’t know why this higher species would want to simulate us.” Randall admitted she did not quite understand why other scientists were even entertaining the notion that the universe is a simulation. “I actually am very interested in why so many people think it’s an interesting question.” She rated the chances that this idea turns out to be true “effectively zero.”

Such existential-sounding hypotheses often tend to be essentially untestable, but some researchers think they could find experimental evidence that we are living in a computer game. One idea is that the programmers might cut corners to make the simulation easier to run. “If there is an underlying simulation of the universe that has the problem of finite computational resources, just as we do, then the laws of physics have to be put on a finite set of points in a finite volume,” said Zohreh Davoudi, a physicist at MIT. “Then we go back and see what kind of signatures we find that tell us we started from non-continuous spacetime.” That evidence might come, for example, in the form of an unusual distribution of energies among the cosmic rays hitting Earth that suggests spacetime is not continuous, but made of discrete points. “That’s the kind of evidence that would convince me as a physicist,” Gates said. Yet proving the opposite—that the universe is real—might be harder. “You’re not going to get proof that we’re not in a simulation, because any evidence that we get could be simulated,” Chalmers said.


If it turns out we really are living in a version of “The Matrix,” though—so what? “Maybe we’re in a simulation, maybe we’re not, but if we are, hey, it’s not so bad,” Chalmers said.

“My advice is to go out and do really interesting things,” Tegmark said, “so the simulators don’t shut you down.”

But some were more contemplative, saying the possibility raises some weighty spiritual questions. “If the simulation hypothesis is valid then we open the door to eternal life and resurrection and things that formally have been discussed in the realm of religion,” Gates suggested. “The reason is quite simple: If we’re programs in the computer, then as long as I have a computer that’s not damaged, I can always re-run the program.”

And if someone somewhere created our simulation, would that make this entity God? “We in this universe can create simulated worlds and there’s nothing remotely spooky about that,” said David Chalmers, a professor of philosophy at New York University. “Our creator isn’t especially spooky, it’s just some teenage hacker in the next universe up.” Turn the tables, and we are essentially gods over our own computer creations. “We don’t think of ourselves as deities when we program Mario, even though we have power over how high Mario jumps,” Tyson said. “There’s no reason to think they’re all-powerful just because they control everything we do.” And a simulated universe introduces another disturbing possibility. “What happens,” Tyson said, “if there’s a bug that crashes the entire program?”


Panama Papers: How can we ensure the revelations actually lead to something?

Panama Papers: How can we ensure the revelations actually lead to something?We know that the Panama Papers are a record-breaking leak, revealing how money from bribery, arms deals, tax evasion, financial fraud and drug trafficking is hidden in tax havens. We also know that a little over a year ago, a similar global journalistic probe dubbed Swiss Leaks had expanded the probe into abetment of tax evasion by HSBC. But as citizens, how can we respond to these revelations?

Resigning to the defeatist idea that “nothing will change” is like allowing those who facilitate the system to carry on with business as usual. If citizens lower their guard, governments will continue getting away with inaction. Public knowledge and vigilance are often grossly underestimated. We need to focus our attention on where it really needs to be, so that we can ask the right questions.

Each time light emerges from these secrecy black holes, names of public figures surface and our attention is riveted. But these leaks shouldn’t just be about punishing the rich and famous. We must urgently acknowledge the systemic nature of the problem. If we stop at naming and shaming these celebrities, we will not get too far. It is the banks, law firms, trusts, intermediaries, legal structures and even governments that aid the machinery that should be in our crosshairs. Government-led investigations should show us what they are doing to trace and dismantle these structures.

The Financial Secrecy Index, which ranks jurisdictions according to their secrecy and the scale of their offshore financial activities, puts Switzerland at number one and Panama at number 13. An estimated $21 trillion to $32 trillion of private financial wealth is located, untaxed or lightly taxed, in secrecy jurisdictions around the world.

Jaitley’s claims

It’s clear from investigations carried out by the Indian Express in collaboration with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists that Indians have money stashed in both Switzerland as well as Panama. There’s no reason to doubt that Indians are also sending money to other secrecy jurisdictions. Local Indian intermediaries are connected to a vast global network, which is hard to trace and unravel. Unless we start looking at “black money” not just as intriguing cases of a handful of secret accounts but rather as a colossal industry, we will fail to push for effective action from governments.

We must understand that laws that aim at arresting these activities will hardly achieve anything if another set of laws is simultaneously being designed for these financial crimes to thrive. The same lawmakers who promise to take action are also backing weak regulation.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, responding to Panama Papers, once again said that the international automatic information exchange treaty will solve all these problems. It’s a disingenuous claim. Panama is not even listed as committed to being on board this multilateral treaty designed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The treaty Jaitley talks about incessantly has dozens of loopholes that will work as escape routes for offenders. Besides, it’s naïve for anyone to imagine that a vast powerful industry of experts that relies on lobbyists and politicians working for them will vanish just like that.

The media should not take “we will take stringent action” as an adequate answer from the government or investigators. Such a statement should not even make it to the headlines unless there are clear answers to what exactly this action is going to be. The government needs to be grilled for its past failures with its laws made for optics and schemes designed to fail.

Nabbing a few culprits and letting the big fish go is often standard practice. If the ultra-rich and corporate giants don’t pay taxes, local economies will suffer and the gap between the rich and the poor will widen. Lynching a few businessmen and politicians is just token action. We should be ready to ask for more. Will the government come out clear on what it intends to do with the information that theAmbanis (HSBC) and Adanis (Panama) were named in these probes?

Legal, not ethical

Blaming ourselves for depravity and corruption is also not helpful. The biggest sharks of the offshore industry and the giant rogue banks are based in wealthy nations that we don’t generally perceive as corrupt. They actively woo potential clients from all over the world, including the poorest of nations, especially those in strife. They must share the blame. And we must cease to think that corruption is impossible to fight lest it become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

What’s confounding to many is that some of these activities can be technically legal. But what is legal is not necessarily ethical. In fact, when the law can be interpreted as “allowing” tax evasion, it creates confusion in public opinion, which in turn makes room for a culture of tolerance and impunity. We should question everything from the black money laws to RBI regulation.

When big leaks such as Panama Papers are made, civil society should make a big push for more transparency from governments on their promised action. If the government is fighting secrecy of tax havens, it’s plain hypocrisy if they are non-transparent about how they are carrying out investigations. If they blame international tax treaties that don’t allow them to be transparent, why don’t they negotiate harder for better treaties?

We often perceive the nexus between the political establishment and the rich and powerful in an abstract way. But these leaks are one of those things that give it concrete form. And this is the time we need to go out and hold them directly accountable.


Microsoft to End PC Gaming as We Know It: Gears of War Developer

Microsoft to End PC Gaming as We Know It: Gears of War Developer

Universal Windows Platform (UWP) is a programming application for Windows 10 developers that lets them create a single version of software to run across all Windows devices including PCs, smartphones, tablets, and the Xbox One. The company is slated to unveil more UWP details at its Build event this month. However UWP has also gained the ire of Tim Sweeney, co-founder of Epic Games, the studio behind the Gears of War and Unreal franchises.

According to Sweeney, UWP is a closed platform. What this means is developers will need Microsoft’s approval to distribute games on Windows 10. This could result in Microsoft controlling the sale of PC games and apps, taking care that only UWP titles would be available on the Windows Store.

(Also see: PC Gaming Is Getting Better, but Publishers Are Getting Worse)

“Microsoft has launched new PC Windows features exclusively in UWP, and is effectively telling developers you can use these Windows features only if you submit to the control of our locked-down UWP ecosystem,” he wrote in the Guardian. “They’re curtailing users’ freedom to install full-featured PC software, and subverting the rights of developers and publishers to maintain a direct relationship with their customers.”

“The specific problem here is that Microsoft’s shiny new “Universal Windows Platform” is locked down, and by default it’s impossible to download UWP apps from the websites of publishers and developers, to install them, update them, and conduct commerce in them outside of the Windows Store,” his post reads.

Furthermore, the software giant can, at any time, prevent apps from being installed from sources other than the Windows Store.

“It’s true that if you dig far enough into Microsoft’s settings-burying UI, you can find a way to install these apps by enabling “side-loading”. But in turning this off by default, Microsoft is unfairly disadvantaging the competition. Bigger-picture, this is a feature Microsoft can revoke at any time using Windows 10’s forced-update process,” his post continues.

windows_10_family.jpgThis is an embarrassing state of affairs for Microsoft. It just launched Gears of War: Ultimate Edition for Windows 10 – a revamped version of the classic Xbox 360 title, as a signal of its renewed interest in the PC gaming space. Bad enough that the game suffers from a myriad of technical problems (some of which we’ve faced in our playthrough as well), that one of its long time collaborators has decided to voice its concerns publicly.

In response, Xbox boss Phil Spencer tweeted that “Windows has always been an open ecosystem” andmore information will be shared during the company’s Build conference.

(Also see: EA Wants to Win PC Gamers Back, but Its Actions Say Otherwise)

Along with this, Kevin Gallo, Corporate Vice President of Windows at Microsoft, told the Guardian: “The Universal Windows Platform is a fully open ecosystem, available to every developer, that can be supported by any store. We continue to make improvements for developers; for example, in the Windows 10 November Update, we enabled people to easily side-load apps by default, with no UX required.

“We want to make Windows the best development platform regardless of technologies used, and offer tools to help developers with existing code bases of HTML/JavaScript, .NET and Win32, C+ + and Objective-C bring their code to Windows, and integrate UWP capabilities. With Xamarin, UWP developers can not only reach all Windows 10 devices, but they can now use a large percentage of their C# code to deliver a fully native mobile app experiences for iOS and Android. We also posted a blog on our development tools recently.”

win_10_apps.jpg(Also see: I Have Over 300 Games on Steam and I’m Leaving It All Behind for GOG Galaxy)

This isn’t the first time Microsoft has run foul with PC game developers. When Windows 8 was launched, Valve’s Gabe Newell referred to it as “this giant sadness” while its Games for Windows Live service was seen as an aberration by both consumers and game makers alike.

If Sweeney’s allegations are true, it means that PC gaming as we know it, in its current form will cease to exist over time, giving Microsoft a monopoly in terms of digital distribution and commerce much like how the App Store and Google Play operate. This would mean flexibility and choice – two of the biggest reasons for gamers to flock to the PC as a gaming platform, as well user generated content or mods as they’re known would have no place in Microsoft’s scheme of things.

“Microsoft is moving against the entire PC industry – including consumers (and gamers in particular), software developers such as Epic Games, publishers like EA and Activision, and distributors like Valve and Good Old Games,” Sweeney claims.

All of this is perhaps indicative of how troubled the dialogue between the company and its development partners has become. More so when you consider that Xbox One (and potentially Windows 10) exclusive Gears of War 4, which runs on Epic’s Unreal Engine 4, is one of the year’s most anticipated games.

Download the Gadgets 360 app for Android and iOS to stay up to date with the latest tech news, product reviews, and exclusive deals on the popular mobiles.

Tags: Epic Games, Gears of War, Gears of War 4, Microsoft, PC Games, PC Gaming, Tim Sweeney,Universal Windows Platform, UWP, Windows 10, Windows Store